财务账目对账

平台使用说明

使用当前 Agent 已提供的文件、搜索、代码或业务工具完成任务，按实际可用能力选择路径。默认以中文回应，并遵循用户指定的语言和交付格式。

• 接受用户在会话中提供的资料，或通过宿主已授权的文件工具读取其指定文件。需要检索、联网、数据库或业务账号时，先确认对应工具真实可用；没有连接器时，使用用户提供的文本或导出文件。
• 文中的斜杠命令是任务示例，直接根据用户的自然语言请求启动同一流程即可；不要依赖 Claude 专属的插件命令或不存在的工具名称。
• 不把示例中的实体、数字或工具结果当作用户事实，不虚构已读取、已执行、已发送或已发布。数据不足时说明缺项并完成现有资料支持的部分。
• 如果任务需要计算或运行脚本，先确认代码运行环境及所需库。工具缺失时给出具体缺项；解释方法、生成草稿不等于已经运行计算。业务写入只使用真实存在且已经授权的工具。
• 当前技能的资源路径均相对于本技能目录。运行脚本时从宿主提供的技能根目录解析绝对路径，用户资料与输出保存在工作目录，不写入技能资源目录。

先统一币种、期间、税额、单位与金额符号。用上传账单即可进行资料整理；实际数值匹配需代码或表格工具。没有 ERP/银行连接时不声称已取数、已入账或已完成会计签核。

Reconciliation

Important: This skill assists with reconciliation workflows but does not provide financial advice. All reconciliations should be reviewed by qualified financial professionals before sign-off.

Methodology and best practices for account reconciliation, including GL-to-subledger, bank reconciliations, and intercompany. Covers reconciling item categorization, aging analysis, and escalation.

Reconciliation Types

GL to Subledger Reconciliation

Compare the general ledger control account balance to the detailed subledger balance.

Common accounts:

• Accounts receivable (GL control vs AR subledger aging)
• Accounts payable (GL control vs AP subledger aging)
• Fixed assets (GL control vs fixed asset register)
• Inventory (GL control vs inventory valuation report)
• Prepaid expenses (GL control vs prepaid amortization schedule)
• Accrued liabilities (GL control vs accrual detail schedules)

Process:

1. Pull GL balance for the control account as of period end
2. Pull subledger trial balance or detail report as of the same date
3. Compare totals — they should match if posting is real-time
4. Investigate any differences (timing of posting, manual entries not reflected, interface errors)

Common causes of differences:

• Manual journal entries posted to the control account but not reflected in the subledger
• Subledger transactions not yet interfaced to the GL
• Timing differences in batch posting
• Reclassification entries in the GL without subledger adjustment
• System interface errors or failed postings

Bank Reconciliation

Compare the GL cash balance to the bank statement balance.

Process:

1. Obtain the bank statement balance as of period end
2. Pull the GL cash account balance as of the same date
3. Identify outstanding checks (issued but not cleared at the bank)
4. Identify deposits in transit (recorded in GL but not yet credited by bank)
5. Identify bank charges, interest, or adjustments not yet recorded in GL
6. Reconcile both sides to an adjusted balance

Standard format:

Balance per bank statement:         $XX,XXX
Add: Deposits in transit            $X,XXX
Less: Outstanding checks           ($X,XXX)
Add/Less: Bank errors               $X,XXX
Adjusted bank balance:              $XX,XXX

Balance per general ledger:         $XX,XXX
Add: Interest/credits not recorded  $X,XXX
Less: Bank fees not recorded       ($X,XXX)
Add/Less: GL errors                 $X,XXX
Adjusted GL balance:                $XX,XXX

Difference:                         $0.00

Intercompany Reconciliation

Reconcile balances between related entities to ensure they net to zero on consolidation.

Process:

1. Pull intercompany receivable/payable balances for each entity pair
2. Compare Entity A's receivable from Entity B to Entity B's payable to Entity A
3. Identify and resolve differences
4. Confirm all intercompany transactions have been recorded on both sides
5. Verify elimination entries are correct for consolidation

Common causes of differences:

• Transactions recorded by one entity but not the other (timing)
• Different FX rates used by each entity
• Misclassification (intercompany vs third-party)
• Disputed amounts or unapplied payments
• Different period-end cut-off practices across entities

Reconciling Item Categorization

Category 1: Timing Differences

Items that exist because of normal processing timing and will clear without action:

• Outstanding checks: Checks issued and recorded in GL, pending bank clearance
• Deposits in transit: Deposits made and recorded in GL, pending bank credit
• In-transit transactions: Items posted in one system but pending interface to the other
• Pending approvals: Transactions awaiting approval to post in one system

Expected resolution: These items should clear within the normal processing cycle (typically 1-5 business days). No adjusting entry needed.

Category 2: Adjustments Required

Items that require a journal entry to correct:

• Unrecorded bank charges: Bank fees, wire charges, returned item fees
• Unrecorded interest: Interest income or expense from bank/lender
• Recording errors: Wrong amount, wrong account, duplicates
• Missing entries: Transactions in one system with no corresponding entry in the other
• Classification errors: Correctly recorded but in the wrong account

Action: Prepare adjusting journal entry to correct the GL or subledger.

Category 3: Requires Investigation

Items that cannot be immediately explained:

• Unidentified differences: Variances with no obvious cause
• Disputed items: Amounts contested between parties
• Aged outstanding items: Items that have not cleared within expected timeframes
• Recurring unexplained differences: Same type of difference appearing each period

Action: Investigate root cause, document findings, escalate if unresolved.

Aging Analysis for Outstanding Items

Track the age of reconciling items to identify stale items requiring escalation:

Age Bucket	Status	Action
0-30 days	Current	Monitor — within normal processing cycle
31-60 days	Aging	Investigate — follow up on why item has not cleared
61-90 days	Overdue	Escalate — notify supervisor, document investigation
90+ days	Stale	Escalate to management — potential write-off or adjustment needed

Aging Report Format

Item #	Description	Amount	Date Originated	Age (Days)	Category	Status	Owner
1	[Detail]	$X,XXX	[Date]	XX	[Type]	[Status]	[Name]

Trending

Track reconciling item totals over time to identify growing balances:

• Compare total outstanding items to prior period
• Flag if total reconciling items exceed materiality threshold
• Flag if number of items is growing period over period
• Identify recurring items that appear every period (may indicate process issue)

Escalation Thresholds

Define escalation triggers based on your organization's risk tolerance:

Trigger	Threshold (Example)	Escalation
Individual item amount	> $10,000	Supervisor review
Individual item amount	> $50,000	Controller review
Total reconciling items	> $100,000	Controller review
Item age	> 60 days	Supervisor follow-up
Item age	> 90 days	Controller / management review
Unreconciled difference	Any amount	Cannot close — must resolve or document
Growing trend	3+ consecutive periods	Process improvement investigation

Note: Set thresholds based on your organization's materiality level and risk appetite. The examples above are illustrative.

Reconciliation Best Practices

1. Timeliness: Complete reconciliations within the close calendar deadline (typically T+3 to T+5 business days after period end)
2. Completeness: Reconcile all balance sheet accounts on a defined frequency (monthly for material accounts, quarterly for immaterial)
3. Documentation: Every reconciliation should include preparer, reviewer, date, and clear explanation of all reconciling items
4. Segregation: The person who reconciles should not be the same person who processes transactions in that account
5. Follow-through: Track open items to resolution — do not just carry items forward indefinitely
6. Root cause analysis: For recurring reconciling items, investigate and fix the underlying process issue
7. Standardization: Use consistent templates and procedures across all accounts
8. Retention: Maintain reconciliations and supporting detail per your organization's document retention policy