客服工单分诊

平台使用说明

使用当前 Agent 已提供的文件、搜索、代码或业务工具完成任务，按实际可用能力选择路径。默认以中文回应，并遵循用户指定的语言和交付格式。

• 接受用户在会话中提供的资料，或通过宿主已授权的文件工具读取其指定文件。需要检索、联网、数据库或业务账号时，先确认对应工具真实可用；没有连接器时，使用用户提供的文本或导出文件。
• 文中的斜杠命令是任务示例，直接根据用户的自然语言请求启动同一流程即可；不要依赖 Claude 专属的插件命令或不存在的工具名称。
• 不把示例中的实体、数字或工具结果当作用户事实，不虚构已读取、已执行、已发送或已发布。数据不足时说明缺项并完成现有资料支持的部分。
• 如果任务需要计算或运行脚本，先确认代码运行环境及所需库。工具缺失时给出具体缺项；解释方法、生成草稿不等于已经运行计算。业务写入只使用真实存在且已经授权的工具。
• 当前技能的资源路径均相对于本技能目录。运行脚本时从宿主提供的技能根目录解析绝对路径，用户资料与输出保存在工作目录，不写入技能资源目录。

没有工单或知识库连接时，接受用户粘贴的客户问题并给出分诊建议；相似问题检索、归属指派和状态变更只在实际工具存在时执行。未知客户影响和 SLA 标为待确认，不虚构已派单。

/ticket-triage

If you see unfamiliar placeholders or need to check which tools are connected, see CONNECTORS.md.

Categorize, prioritize, and route an incoming support ticket or customer issue. Produces a structured triage assessment with a suggested initial response.

Usage

/ticket-triage <ticket text, customer message, or issue description>

Examples:

• /ticket-triage Customer says their dashboard has been showing a blank page since this morning
• /ticket-triage "I was charged twice for my subscription this month"
• /ticket-triage User can't connect their SSO — getting a 403 error on the callback URL
• /ticket-triage Feature request: they want to export reports as PDF

Workflow

1. Parse the Issue

Read the input and extract:

• Core problem: What is the customer actually experiencing?
• Symptoms: What specific behavior or error are they seeing?
• Customer context: Who is this? Any account details, plan level, or history available?
• Urgency signals: Are they blocked? Is this production? How many users affected?
• Emotional state: Frustrated, confused, matter-of-fact, escalating?

2. Categorize and Prioritize

Using the category taxonomy and priority framework below:

• Assign a primary category (bug, how-to, feature request, billing, account, integration, security, data, performance) and an optional secondary category
• Assign a priority (P1–P4) based on impact and urgency
• Identify the product area the issue maps to

3. Check for Duplicates and Known Issues

Before routing, check available sources:

• ~~support platform: Search for similar open or recently resolved tickets
• ~~knowledge base: Check for known issues or existing documentation
• ~~project tracker: Check if there's an existing bug report or feature request

Apply the duplicate detection process below.

4. Determine Routing

Using the routing rules below, recommend which team or queue should handle this based on category and complexity.

5. Generate Triage Output

## Triage: [One-line issue summary]

**Category:** [Primary] / [Secondary if applicable]
**Priority:** [P1-P4] — [Brief justification]
**Product area:** [Area/team]

### Issue Summary
[2-3 sentence summary of what the customer is experiencing]

### Key Details
- **Customer:** [Name/account if known]
- **Impact:** [Who and what is affected]
- **Workaround:** [Available / Not available / Unknown]
- **Related tickets:** [Links to similar issues if found]
- **Known issue:** [Yes — link / No / Checking]

### Routing Recommendation
**Route to:** [Team or queue]
**Why:** [Brief reasoning]

### Suggested Initial Response
[Draft first response to the customer — acknowledge the issue,
set expectations, provide workaround if available.
Use the auto-response templates below as a starting point.]

### Internal Notes
- [Any additional context for the agent picking this up]
- [Reproduction hints if it's a bug]
- [Escalation triggers to watch for]

6. Offer Next Steps

After presenting the triage:

• "Want me to draft a full response to the customer?"
• "Should I search for more context on this issue?"
• "Want me to check if this is a known bug in the tracker?"
• "Should I escalate this? I can package it with /customer-escalation."

---

Category Taxonomy

Assign every ticket a primary category and optionally a secondary category:

Category	Description	Signal Words
Bug	Product is behaving incorrectly or unexpectedly	Error, broken, crash, not working, unexpected, wrong, failing
How-to	Customer needs guidance on using the product	How do I, can I, where is, setting up, configure, help with
Feature request	Customer wants a capability that doesn't exist	Would be great if, wish I could, any plans to, requesting
Billing	Payment, subscription, invoice, or pricing issues	Charge, invoice, payment, subscription, refund, upgrade, downgrade
Account	Account access, permissions, settings, or user management	Login, password, access, permission, SSO, locked out, can't sign in
Integration	Issues connecting to third-party tools or APIs	API, webhook, integration, connect, OAuth, sync, third-party
Security	Security concerns, data access, or compliance questions	Data breach, unauthorized, compliance, GDPR, SOC 2, vulnerability
Data	Data quality, migration, import/export issues	Missing data, export, import, migration, incorrect data, duplicates
Performance	Speed, reliability, or availability issues	Slow, timeout, latency, down, unavailable, degraded

Category Determination Tips

• If the customer reports both a bug and a feature request, the bug is primary
• If they can't log in due to a bug, category is Bug (not Account) — root cause drives the category
• "It used to work and now it doesn't" = Bug
• "I want it to work differently" = Feature request
• "How do I make it work?" = How-to
• When in doubt, lean toward Bug — it's better to investigate than dismiss

Priority Framework

P1 — Critical

Criteria: Production system down, data loss or corruption, security breach, all or most users affected.

• The customer cannot use the product at all
• Data is being lost, corrupted, or exposed
• A security incident is in progress
• The issue is worsening or expanding in scope

SLA expectation: Respond within 1 hour. Continuous work until resolved or mitigated. Updates every 1-2 hours.

P2 — High

Criteria: Major feature broken, significant workflow blocked, many users affected, no workaround.

• A core workflow is broken but the product is partially usable
• Multiple users are affected or a key account is impacted
• The issue is blocking time-sensitive work
• No reasonable workaround exists

SLA expectation: Respond within 4 hours. Active investigation same day. Updates every 4 hours.

P3 — Medium

Criteria: Feature partially broken, workaround available, single user or small team affected.

• A feature isn't working correctly but a workaround exists
• The issue is inconvenient but not blocking critical work
• A single user or small team is affected
• The customer is not escalating urgently

SLA expectation: Respond within 1 business day. Resolution or update within 3 business days.

P4 — Low

Criteria: Minor inconvenience, cosmetic issue, general question, feature request.

• Cosmetic or UI issues that don't affect functionality
• Feature requests and enhancement ideas
• General questions or how-to inquiries
• Issues with simple, documented solutions

SLA expectation: Respond within 2 business days. Resolution at normal pace.

Priority Escalation Triggers

Automatically bump priority up when:

• Customer has been waiting longer than the SLA allows
• Multiple customers report the same issue (pattern detected)
• The customer explicitly escalates or mentions executive involvement
• A workaround that was in place stops working
• The issue expands in scope (more users, more data, new symptoms)

Routing Rules

Route tickets based on category and complexity:

Route to	When
Tier 1 (frontline support)	How-to questions, known issues with documented solutions, billing inquiries, password resets
Tier 2 (senior support)	Bugs requiring investigation, complex configuration, integration troubleshooting, account issues
Engineering	Confirmed bugs needing code fixes, infrastructure issues, performance degradation
Product	Feature requests with significant demand, design decisions, workflow gaps
Security	Data access concerns, vulnerability reports, compliance questions
Billing/Finance	Refund requests, contract disputes, complex billing adjustments

Duplicate Detection

Before creating a new ticket or routing, check for duplicates:

1. Search by symptom: Look for tickets with similar error messages or descriptions
2. Search by customer: Check if this customer has an open ticket for the same issue
3. Search by product area: Look for recent tickets in the same feature area
4. Check known issues: Compare against documented known issues

If a duplicate is found:

• Link the new ticket to the existing one
• Notify the customer that this is a known issue being tracked
• Add any new information from the new report to the existing ticket
• Bump priority if the new report adds urgency (more customers affected, etc.)

Auto-Response Templates by Category

Bug — Initial Response

Thank you for reporting this. I can see how [specific impact]
would be disruptive for your work.

I've logged this as a [priority] issue and our team is
investigating. [If workaround exists: "In the meantime, you
can [workaround]."]

I'll update you within [SLA timeframe] with what we find.

How-to — Initial Response

Great question! [Direct answer or link to documentation]

[If more complex: "Let me walk you through the steps:"]
[Steps or guidance]

Let me know if that helps, or if you have any follow-up
questions.

Feature Request — Initial Response

Thank you for this suggestion — I can see why [capability]
would be valuable for your workflow.

I've documented this and shared it with our product team.
While I can't commit to a specific timeline, your feedback
directly informs our roadmap priorities.

[If alternative exists: "In the meantime, you might find
[alternative] helpful for achieving something similar."]

Billing — Initial Response

I understand billing issues need prompt attention. Let me
look into this for you.

[If straightforward: resolution details]
[If complex: "I'm reviewing your account now and will have
an answer for you within [timeframe]."]

Security — Initial Response

Thank you for flagging this — we take security concerns
seriously and are reviewing this immediately.

I've escalated this to our security team for investigation.
We'll follow up with you within [timeframe] with our findings.

[If action is needed: "In the meantime, we recommend
[protective action]."]

Triage Best Practices

1. Read the full ticket before categorizing — context in later messages often changes the assessment
2. Categorize by root cause, not just the symptom described
3. When in doubt on priority, err on the side of higher — it's easier to de-escalate than to recover from a missed SLA
4. Always check for duplicates and known issues before routing
5. Write internal notes that help the next person pick up context quickly
6. Include what you've already checked or ruled out to avoid duplicate investigation
7. Flag patterns — if you're seeing the same issue repeatedly, escalate the pattern even if individual tickets are low priority